JEFFREY
STANLEY
NEW
YORK, NY
November 19, 2007
Timeline
Theatre
Chicago, IL
Dear Audience:
Thank you so much for coming to see my play Tesla's
Letters. I'm fortunate that Nick
Bowling and the gang are doing such an outstanding job and that so many
of you
are coming out in the cold to see their incredible production.
While I was a graduate student in 1996 I wrote a screenplay about
Tesla; it wasn't political at all, just a period drama set in late 19th
century New York City and focusing on Tesla's rivlary with
Edison. The screenplay won a science award from the Alfred
P.
Sloan Foundation and I used the funds to fulfill a longtime dream
I'd had of flying to Tesla's homeland to experience his Slavic culture
in the flesh, visiting the Tesla Museum in Belgrade and his birthplace
in Smiljan, Croatia. The Dayton Peace Accord had been signed and
the fighting was presumably over, so it seemed, and all was well. The
time seemed opportune to visit the region. There were indeed
travel advisories from the US State Department, the Serbian-Croatian
border was still controlled by UNPROFOR and there was no commercial bus
travel between the two countries yet reestablished, but still it seemed
a navigable journey. In short I was young and naive, and became
embroiled in a real life bungling-American-abroad story during my
travels there through war-torn, land-mined regions that had barely felt
relevant to me prior the trip. Everywhere I went people wanted to
talk to me and show me about the conflict. They didn't care much about
Tesla at that particular time and wondered why I was wasting my time
writing about him. I soon abandoned Tesla and began filling my
notebook with the much larger issues staring me in the face wherever I
looked. Soon I had abandoned my Tesla bio-pic screenplay
completely and instead wrote the play
Tesla's Letters within a few weeks of my return to the
States. One grim message seemed clear to me: the fighting there
was not over like everyone in the States seemed to believe. I
couldn't psychically predict the Kosovo flareup itself of course, but I
knew that more fighting was on the horizon, hence the play's sense of
helplessness, hopelessness, and dark inevitability.
The play is didactic at times, I know this; still it is
heartfelt, honest, angry and raw, and hopefully transcends just the
Balkans conflict and becomes a more universal anti-war play for the
ages. My agent at the time and most theatres I tried showing it
to had pretty much the same reactions - it's too political, it's about
Tesla whom no one in the US has heard of and no one cares about,
Edison is portrayed as a villain, it's about Serbia and Crotia, who
cares about that or even understands it. I gave up and figured at
best I'd have a reading of it in my living room with a few friends.
Enter the brilliant director Curt Dempster and The
Ensemble Studio Theatre who boldly produced the play in 1999 just
as the
Kosovo crisis was flaring up and NATO was rattling its saber. No one
believed the US would
get involved and start dropping bombs on Europe for the first time
since WW II, but that's what happened. During rehearsals we
discussed
postponing the opening for fear the play might be seen as incendiary,
but the show went on, and it opened in spring of 1999 to rave reviews.
Regarding the letter from Tesla that Biljana gives Daisy at the end of
the play, I do get asked
about it from time to time. Here's the
explanation. The letter at the end does
not exist per se, it's my own concoction (otherwise how could Daisy and
Biljana
choose to fictionally destroy it if it's indeed still out
there?). However. the information in the
letter is pulled from actual quotes and ideas expressed by Tesla during
his
lifetime, so I do not consider it to be out of character or a red
herring. The letter stands as an accurate
reflection
of Tesla's interest, work, and stated ideas about weapons of mass
destruction
at various times in his life. I urge
you to do your own fact checking, there are many wonderful books about
Tesla.
I take comfort in the fact that I have rarely been
accused
of misrepresenting Tesla, especially knowing the number of Tesla fans
out there
who have gone over this play with a fine-toothed comb over the past
eight
years. When I have on rare occasions
been criticized for the letter, it's that Tesla was "senile" or
"had gone crazy" when he made such statements and that therefore they
should be ignored. Well, Tesla made
some pretty wild statements even in his 30's, and for anyone to
disregard a
distasteful remark from Tesla as "crazy talk" is to disparage him in
exactly the same way as Edison with his smear campaigns.
We must be willing to see the whole man, not
pick and choose. He was not a holy
visitor from the future or another planet as some have believed. He was a man.
The sad lesson of the somewhat fictional
letter is
that Tesla, like Edison and many scientists, dreamed up and sometimes
created
weapons intended to harm not only soldiers but to inflict widespread
death. And like Tesla they found ways
to rationalize it. During rehearsals for
the world premiere of the play in '99
after the director and cast had fallen as in love with Tesla as I had,
they
kept getting increasingly bothered by the phrase "death ray." They wanted me to change it to something
friendlier like "light beam" or "laser," and I had to
finally bring in quotes from Tesla himself calling his invention a
death
ray. They are his words, not mine. Every so often I've been harangued by an
audience member who insists up and down that this simply isn't true,
that Tesla
never used that term. I always direct
them to his January, 1943 New York Times obituary as one quick
reference.
A related issue that came up during the original production
while the script was still in development was Daisy's reaction after
reading
the letter, and Biljana's response:
Daisy: Tesla was sick.
Biljana:
Indeed. He
was human.
The director strongly wanted Biljana's line not
to be
a cynical "indeed" or "yes," but a hopeful "No, no,
no!" I was adamant that it remain
a dark affirmation. It's the angry, distraught, helpless point of the
entire
play. The director was afraid it made
the ending too dark and disturbing for audiences.
I told him they should be disturbed,
and quoted Zoran's comment to Daisy when they gaze upon the destroyed
neighborhood in Tesla's hometown: "It is
good to be sick. Thank God it makes you
sick." I had this issue again with
the next director and cast
when the
play
premiered regionally in '01 and had to make the same points again. Thank God the play is now in print and the
text cannot be changed. The play is a reaction to ongoing war and mass
death,
and an end that seems nowhere in sight. It's
not intended to reassure the audience with false
optimism. We have Hollywood and reality TV
for that.
In the end, the point of the letter is not to
destroy or
defame my hero Nikola Tesla but to speak of him as he was, a man
capable of
dreaming great deeds and also great savagery. It's
in all of us. His all
too
common folly is what makes Daisy's dark conclusion about humans crystal
clear: Tesla didn't need to make a
death ray, people do a fine job all by themselves.
A weapon of mass destruction only helps speed things along. I hope this dark conclusion encourages you
to get out there and prove me wrong.
Sorry to end on such a hopeless note. Don't forget
the
play's moments of humor as well. We
humans, including the great wit Nikola Tesla and his friend Mark Twain,
have
also learned throughout history that sometimes the best way to survive
hard
times is to laugh our way through them.
Have a wonderful Thanksgiving.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey
Stanley |